data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ccc2/7ccc22d76af4412dbaa960ca71bd59fdf775721d" alt=""
The kinds of impacts the NRC committee discusses may sound familiar from the 2007 report of the Intergovernmental
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d86b4/d86b40abf0ccd65ec2382c0188229c22559f27f1" alt=""
For example, if society managed to stabilize the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases at a level equivalent to 670 parts per million of carbon dioxide—shy of the doubling or tripling that unrestrained emissions might produce by century's end—the world
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f42ab/f42ab5fe8d9bc3ca748a32ea2b5060832f85c45e" alt=""
Even if the stabilization of greenhouse gases could be maintained, the report says, another 2°C of delayed warming would follow over many decades. That would double the cited impacts to devastating 20% to 40% reductions in rainfall in those areas and 40% to 60% reductions in the cited crops. And there would be no relief for a very long time.
Carbon dioxide lingers so long in the atmosphere, "it could effectively
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90c0e/90c0ed94d11d2d99cb8e7250daf75249f103ecea" alt=""
The closest the committee comes to a policy recommendation is to point out the magnitude of the challenge. "Emissions reductions larger than about 80%, relative to whatever peak global emissions rate may be reached, are required to approximately stabilize carbon dioxide concentrations," it observes.
Source:
Science, "Official Reminder: A Hotter Millennium Is a Bad Thing", accessed July 19,2010
No comments:
Post a Comment