data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cc3e/1cc3ecef8ff38a309d2bbcc1c7ef163204966ce6" alt=""
The report by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office was the second positive analysis of the bill by a government agency in a month, but is likely to carry more weight than a similar report issued by the Environmental Protection Agency. The CBO is the entity responsible for providing Congress with nonpartisan analyses of economic and budget issues, and lawmakers rely on it for guidance.
The CBO report was immediately hailed by John Kerry and Joseph Lieberman, the bill's sponsors, who are struggling to move the climate measure through a divided Congress. Lawmakers have quietly begun considering a more modest approach that would target the electricity sector, in case the more sweeping measure fails.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7cfec/7cfecfe8b18da471b4e4bc241295bfc4af4ce172" alt=""
“There is no more room for excuses; this must be our year to passThe Senate bill would tax carbon dioxide emissions produced bycomprehensive climate and energy legislation and begin to send a price signal on carbon,” Kerry and Lieberman, the joint sponsors of the bill, said in a joint statement. “Many of our colleagues have said they flatly oppose anything that adds a penny to the deficit, so we hope they look anew at this initiative, which reduces it.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25580/2558032276c7f5263d90522da25a9949cafab1a2" alt=""
An analysis by the EPA last month concluded that the Senate bill would cost households an average of $79 to $146 per year. Kerry and Lieberman said they believe Americans are willing to pay less than a dollar a day to curb global warming, reduce oil imports and create energy-related jobs.
The legislation aims to cut emissions of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping greenhouse gases by 17 percent by 2020 and by more than 80 percent by 2050.
Even as the CBO was conducting its analysis, Kerry and other lawmakers have begun considering the more modest approach that would limit the carbon tax to the electricity sector.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/056c3/056c36ffe886b859b5e5709e8d8756d2dab40ae3" alt=""
Some White House officials have begun to speak favorably about such a "utility-only" approach, which they believe could be more attractive to Republicans. At a White House meeting last week, a bipartisan group of senators discussed an emissions cap that would be limited to stationary sources, which would primarily mean power plants and refineries.
No decisions have been reached, although Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., is aiming to bring energy legislation to the Senate floor before the August recess.
Source:
Associated Press, "CBO says climate bill would cut deficit by $19B", accessed July 8, 2010
No comments:
Post a Comment