
Scientists from the Zoological Society of London (ZSL), Queen Mary, University of London and CICIMAR, studied blue whales, fin whales and sperm whales in the Gulf of California to determine the effect of rising levels of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) on their health.
For a number of years scientists have observed blisters on the skin of whales. Now, using high-quality photos to give accurate counts of the blisters and analyzing areas of damage in skin samples, this research has found that the three species of whale exhibit skin damage that is commonly associated with acute sunburn in humans.
Notably, the scientists also found that signs of sun damage were more

The UV index for the Gulf of California fluctuates between high and extremely high throughout the year. Lead author, Laura Martinez-Levasseur from ZSL and Queen Mary, says, "Whales need to come to the surface to breathe air, to socialize and to feed their young, meaning that they are frequently exposed to the full force of the sun.

Co-author Professor Edel O'Toole, from Queen Mary, says, "As we would expect to see in humans, the whale species that spent more 'time in the sun' suffered greater sun damage. We predict that whales will experience more severe sun damage if ultraviolet radiation continues to increase."
The next phase of the research will look at the expression of genes involved in the production of skin pigmentation and DNA damage repair and try to gain a greater understanding of the consequences of

Lead author Dr Karina Acevedo-Whitehouse, from ZSL says, "We have shown that exposure to strong sun is damaging to whales' skin. We now need to understand the knock-on effects and whether whales are able to respond quickly to increasing radiation by enhancing their natural sun-protection mechanisms."
Source:
Science Daily, "Sunburnt Whales: Three Species Show Signs of Sun Damage to Skin", accessed November 17, 2010
Journal Reference:
Karina Acevedo-Whitehouse et al. Acute sun damage and photo protective responses in whales. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 10 November 2010 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.20101903
No comments:
Post a Comment